Shoals Technologies vs Semtech
SHLS and SMTC side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How SHLS and SMTC compare
Semtech is the larger company, worth 7.7 times as much as Shoals Technologies ($10.7B against $1.4B).
On earnings, Shoals Technologies is cheaper: it trades at 36.0× trailing earnings, against 75.9× for Semtech.
Shoals Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (49.2% versus 17.8% for Semtech).
Semtech keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 13.1% compared with 5.8% at Shoals Technologies.
Shoals Technologies scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 8 for Semtech), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | SHLS | SMTC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.4B | $10.7B |
| Share price | $8.29 | $114.59 |
| Change, 1 year | −7.2% | 59.8% |
| Change, 5 years | −74.8% | 24.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.11 | 1.84 |
| Employees | 1,480 | 1,920 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 | 3 |
| Performance score | 2 | 2 |
| Health score | 3 | 3 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 36.0× (better) | 75.9× |
| P/S | 2.2× (better) | 9.1× |
| P/B | 2.2× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 16.2× (better) | 116× |
| P/FCF | – | 55.4× |
| FCF yield | −2.5% | 1.8% (better) |
| Fair value | $9.59 | $39.48 |
| Margin of safety | 13.6% (better) | −190% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 49.2% (better) | 17.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 22.0% (better) | 12.0% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 13.7% | 546% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 15.0% | 421% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 30.9% | 52.1% (better) |
| Operating margin | 11.2% (better) | 8.0% |
| Net margin | 5.8% | 13.1% (better) |
| FCF margin | −5.3% | 16.4% (better) |
| Return on equity | 6.2% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 8.6% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 3.06 |
| Interest coverage | 5.7× (better) | 3.0× |
| Current ratio | 2.45 (better) | 1.70 |
| Altman Z-score | 3.84 | 8.06 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 105% | 100% |
| Held by insiders | 2.0% | 0.51% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$618K (better) | −$18.8M |
| Short interest, % of float | 9.5% | 8.1% |
Go deeper
- SHLS stock overview
- SHLS income statement
- SHLS valuation and score
- SMTC stock overview
- SMTC income statement
- SMTC valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.