Smithfield Foods vs Tyson Foods
SFD and TSN side by side, both in food and kindred products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How SFD and TSN compare
Tyson Foods is the larger company, worth 2.8 times as much as Smithfield Foods ($20.1B against $7.2B).
On earnings, Smithfield Foods is cheaper: it trades at 6.8× trailing earnings, against 35.2× for Tyson Foods.
Smithfield Foods grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (4.3% versus 2.9% for Tyson Foods).
Smithfield Foods keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 6.8% compared with 1.0% at Tyson Foods.
Both pay dividends: Smithfield Foods yields 6.5% and Tyson Foods 3.6%.
Smithfield Foods scores higher on the StockData Score (20 against 9 for Tyson Foods), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | SFD | TSN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $7.2B | $20.1B |
| Share price | $18.34 | $57.04 |
| Change, 1 year | −15.9% | 12.5% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −30.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.25 | 0.35 |
| Employees | 32K | 133K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 20 (better) | 9 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 6.8× (better) | 35.2× |
| P/S | 0.5× | 0.4× (better) |
| P/B | 1.0× (better) | 1.1× |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.7× (better) | 10.4× |
| P/FCF | 8.9× (better) | 17.3× |
| PEG | 2.20 | – |
| FCF yield | 11.2% (better) | 5.8% |
| Fair value | $47.97 | $50.56 |
| Margin of safety | 61.8% (better) | −12.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 4.3% (better) | 2.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 3.3% | 4.7% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 16.8% (better) | −26.8% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 13.6% (better) | −26.0% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 1429% (better) | −25.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 13.4% (better) | 6.1% |
| Operating margin | 8.6% (better) | 2.3% |
| Net margin | 6.8% (better) | 1.0% |
| FCF margin | 5.2% (better) | 2.1% |
| Return on equity | 15.9% (better) | 3.2% |
| Return on invested capital | 13.9% (better) | 3.6% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.29 (better) | 0.44 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.39 (better) | 2.76 |
| Interest coverage | 38.1× (better) | 3.1× |
| Current ratio | 2.56 (better) | 1.43 |
| Altman Z-score | 3.29 (better) | 3.20 |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 6.5% (better) | 3.6% |
| Payout ratio | – | 122% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Buyback yield | 0.00% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 6.5% (better) | 3.6% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 13.8% | 73.7% |
| Held by insiders | – | 22.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$4.4M (better) | −$5.2M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 3 |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 3.2% |
Go deeper
- SFD stock overview
- SFD income statement
- SFD valuation and score
- TSN stock overview
- TSN income statement
- TSN valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.