SentinelOne vs Tenable
S and TENB side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How S and TENB compare
SentinelOne is the larger company, worth 1.7 times as much as Tenable ($7.7B against $4.5B).
SentinelOne grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (21.1% versus 9.9% for Tenable).
Tenable keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 0.65% compared with −31.0% at SentinelOne.
SentinelOne scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 7 for Tenable), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | S | TENB |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $7.7B | $4.5B |
| Share price | $22.20 | $40.76 |
| Change, 1 year | 29.5% | 48.2% |
| Change, 5 years | −68.4% | −25.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.64 | 1.22 |
| Employees | 2,900 | 1,995 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 (better) | 7 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 815× |
| P/S | 7.0× | 4.3× (better) |
| P/B | 5.3× (better) | 22.6× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 53.1× |
| P/FCF | 137× | 17.0× (better) |
| FCF yield | 0.73% | 5.9% (better) |
| Fair value | $16.73 | $16.15 |
| Margin of safety | −32.7% (better) | −152% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 21.1% (better) | 9.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 60.8% (better) | 17.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 72.5% | 78.1% (better) |
| Operating margin | −29.5% | 3.6% (better) |
| Net margin | −31.0% | 0.65% (better) |
| FCF margin | 5.1% | 25.3% (better) |
| Return on equity | −23.0% | 2.5% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −34.4% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | 1.4× |
| Current ratio | 1.45 (better) | 0.79 |
| Altman Z-score | 3.82 (better) | 1.78 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | 7.9% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 7.9% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 82.6% | 105% |
| Held by insiders | 6.6% | 1.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$42.5M | −$4.4M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 10.4% | 14.6% |
Go deeper
- S stock overview
- S income statement
- S valuation and score
- TENB stock overview
- TENB income statement
- TENB valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.