RTX vs Textron
RTX and TXT side by side, both in aircraft and parts. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How RTX and TXT compare
RTX is the larger company, worth 18 times as much as Textron ($269B against $14.7B).
On earnings, Textron is cheaper: it trades at 15.4× trailing earnings, against 35.2× for RTX.
RTX grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (11.8% versus 8.5% for Textron).
RTX keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 8.3% compared with 6.3% at Textron.
Both pay dividends: RTX yields 1.4% and Textron 0.09%.
Textron scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 11 for RTX), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | RTX | TXT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $269B | $14.7B |
| Share price | $199.80 | $85.70 |
| Change, 1 year | 13.3% | 7.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 119% | 10.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.61 | 0.91 |
| Employees | 180K | 34K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 | 17 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 3 | 3 |
| Health score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 35.2× | 15.4× (better) |
| P/S | 2.9× | 1.0× (better) |
| P/B | 4.1× | 1.8× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 20.1× | – |
| P/FCF | 23.6× | 18.2× (better) |
| PEG | 2.85 | 1.83 (better) |
| FCF yield | 4.2% | 5.5% (better) |
| Fair value | $165.81 | $114.00 |
| Margin of safety | −20.5% | 24.8% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 11.8% (better) | 8.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 9.4% (better) | 4.9% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 25.9% (better) | 17.7% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 24.8% (better) | 22.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 11.2% | – |
| Net margin | 8.3% (better) | 6.3% |
| FCF margin | 12.2% (better) | 5.2% |
| Return on equity | 12.0% | 12.5% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 8.8% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.56 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.91 | – |
| Current ratio | 1.01 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 2.73 (better) | 2.20 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.4% (better) | 0.09% |
| Payout ratio | 48.1% | 1.7% |
| Years of dividend growth | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 4.3% (better) | 0.00% |
| Buyback yield | 0.00% | 5.4% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 1.4% | 5.5% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 80.3% | 92.4% |
| Held by insiders | 0.07% | 0.77% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$39.5M | −$29.2M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.0% | 4.8% |
Go deeper
- RTX stock overview
- RTX income statement
- RTX valuation and score
- TXT stock overview
- TXT income statement
- TXT valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.