Regal Rexnord vs Timken
RRX and TKR side by side, both in general industrial machinery and equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How RRX and TKR compare
Regal Rexnord is the larger company, worth 1.4 times as much as Timken ($10.5B against $7.7B).
On earnings, Timken is cheaper: it trades at 30.1× trailing earnings, against 32.4× for Regal Rexnord.
Timken grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (5.5% versus 3.5% for Regal Rexnord).
Timken keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 5.4% compared with 5.4% at Regal Rexnord.
Both pay dividends: Regal Rexnord yields 0.89% and Timken 1.3%.
Timken scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 10 for Regal Rexnord), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | RRX | TKR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $10.5B | $7.7B |
| Share price | $157.24 | $110.90 |
| Change, 1 year | 4.4% | 39.9% |
| Change, 5 years | −4.4% | 52.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.13 | 0.99 |
| Employees | 29K | 19K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 32.4× | 30.1× (better) |
| P/S | 1.7× | 1.6× (better) |
| P/B | 1.5× (better) | 2.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | 20.7× | 12.9× (better) |
| P/FCF | 22.5× | 19.9× (better) |
| FCF yield | 4.5% | 5.0% (better) |
| Fair value | $145.09 | $96.69 |
| Margin of safety | −8.4% (better) | −14.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 3.5% | 5.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 15.3% (better) | 5.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 29.4% (better) | −16.5% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 29.0% (better) | −16.1% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −1.8% | 2.0% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 37.8% (better) | 30.8% |
| Operating margin | 11.7% (better) | 10.5% |
| Net margin | 5.4% | 5.4% (better) |
| FCF margin | 7.7% | 8.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | 4.8% | 8.2% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 5.2% | 7.6% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.67 | 0.65 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 5.90 | 2.27 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 2.1× | 4.8× (better) |
| Current ratio | 2.28 | 3.10 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.91 | 3.18 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.89% | 1.3% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 28.7% | 38.3% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 12 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 3.1% | 4.2% (better) |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.78% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.89% | 2.1% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 108% | 94.6% |
| Held by insiders | 0.56% | 2.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$27.7M | −$18.1M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.6% | 7.3% |
Go deeper
- RRX stock overview
- RRX income statement
- RRX valuation and score
- TKR stock overview
- TKR income statement
- TKR valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.