Nordson vs Regal Rexnord
NDSN and RRX side by side, both in general industrial machinery and equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How NDSN and RRX compare
Nordson is the larger company, worth 1.7 times as much as Regal Rexnord ($18.0B against $10.5B).
On earnings, Regal Rexnord is cheaper: it trades at 32.4× trailing earnings, against 32.6× for Nordson.
Nordson grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (7.0% versus 3.5% for Regal Rexnord).
Nordson keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 18.6% compared with 5.4% at Regal Rexnord.
Both pay dividends: Nordson yields 1.1% and Regal Rexnord 0.89%.
Nordson scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 10 for Regal Rexnord), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | NDSN | RRX |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $18.0B | $10.5B |
| Share price | $322.67 | $157.24 |
| Change, 1 year | 38.4% | 4.4% |
| Change, 5 years | 23.5% | −4.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.01 | 1.13 |
| Employees | 8,000 | 29K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 18 (better) | 10 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 32.6× | 32.4× (better) |
| P/S | 6.0× | 1.7× (better) |
| P/B | 5.5× | 1.5× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 22.3× | 20.7× (better) |
| P/FCF | 24.8× | 22.5× (better) |
| FCF yield | 4.0% | 4.5% (better) |
| Fair value | $247.33 | $145.09 |
| Margin of safety | −30.5% | −8.4% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 7.0% (better) | 3.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.6% | 15.3% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 22.0% | 29.4% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 24.2% | 29.0% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 14.8% (better) | −1.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 55.3% (better) | 37.8% |
| Operating margin | 26.9% (better) | 11.7% |
| Net margin | 18.6% (better) | 5.4% |
| FCF margin | 24.3% (better) | 7.7% |
| Return on equity | 17.8% (better) | 4.8% |
| Return on invested capital | 13.4% (better) | 5.2% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.53 (better) | 0.67 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.84 (better) | 5.90 |
| Interest coverage | 8.8× (better) | 2.1× |
| Current ratio | 1.82 | 2.28 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 6.24 (better) | 1.91 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.1% (better) | 0.89% |
| Payout ratio | 33.0% | 28.7% |
| Years of dividend growth | 16 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 15.6% (better) | 3.1% |
| Buyback yield | 1.1% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 2.1% (better) | 0.89% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 76.5% | 108% |
| Held by insiders | 0.55% | 0.56% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$25.6M (better) | −$27.7M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.6% | 5.6% |
Go deeper
- NDSN stock overview
- NDSN income statement
- NDSN valuation and score
- RRX stock overview
- RRX income statement
- RRX valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.