Rapid7 vs SentinelOne
RPD and S side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How RPD and S compare
SentinelOne is the larger company, worth 7.8 times as much as Rapid7 ($8.8B against $1.1B).
SentinelOne grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (21.1% versus 0.07% for Rapid7).
Rapid7 keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 2.4% compared with −31.0% at SentinelOne.
SentinelOne scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 4 for Rapid7), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | RPD | S |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.1B | $8.8B |
| Share price | $16.56 | $25.15 |
| Change, 1 year | −9.4% | 49.0% |
| Change, 5 years | −88.0% | −62.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.56 | 1.62 |
| Employees | 2,613 | 2,900 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 9 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 0 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 53.4× | – |
| P/S | 1.3× (better) | 8.0× |
| P/B | 5.7× (better) | 6.0× |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.5× | – |
| P/FCF | 7.7× (better) | 155× |
| FCF yield | 13.0% (better) | 0.65% |
| Fair value | $15.45 | $17.14 |
| Margin of safety | −7.2% (better) | −46.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 0.07% | 21.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 15.9% | 60.8% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −28.1% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −22.5% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 69.3% | 72.5% (better) |
| Operating margin | 1.2% (better) | −29.5% |
| Net margin | 2.4% (better) | −31.0% |
| FCF margin | 16.9% (better) | 5.1% |
| Return on equity | 14.0% (better) | −23.0% |
| Return on invested capital | – | −34.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | 1.0× | – |
| Current ratio | 0.80 | 1.45 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.02 | 4.48 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 103% | 82.6% |
| Held by insiders | 14.7% | 8.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $3.9M (better) | −$26.1M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 13.3% | 6.0% |
Go deeper
- RPD stock overview
- RPD income statement
- RPD valuation and score
- S stock overview
- S income statement
- S valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.