Ross Stores vs Urban Outfitters
ROST and URBN side by side, both in family clothing stores. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ROST and URBN compare
Ross Stores is the larger company, worth 9.4 times as much as Urban Outfitters ($72.9B against $7.8B).
On earnings, Urban Outfitters is cheaper: it trades at 14.2× trailing earnings, against 27.6× for Ross Stores.
Ross Stores grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (14.0% versus 11.0% for Urban Outfitters).
Ross Stores keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 10.8% compared with 8.8% at Urban Outfitters.
Ross Stores pays a dividend yielding 0.76%; Urban Outfitters does not pay one.
Ross Stores scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 13 for Urban Outfitters), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ROST | URBN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $72.9B | $7.8B |
| Share price | $228.28 | $90.72 |
| Change, 1 year | 44.2% | 36.7% |
| Change, 5 years | 90.8% | 156% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.90 | 1.10 |
| Employees | 111K | 31K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 18 (better) | 13 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Health score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 27.6× | 14.2× (better) |
| P/S | 3.0× | 1.2× (better) |
| P/B | 10.8× | 2.7× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 17.8× | 8.1× (better) |
| P/FCF | 26.1× (better) | 26.3× |
| PEG | 1.88 | 0.32 (better) |
| FCF yield | 3.8% (better) | 3.8% |
| Fair value | $120.77 | $77.17 |
| Margin of safety | −89.0% | −17.6% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 14.0% (better) | 11.0% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 12.7% (better) | 12.3% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 28.9% (better) | 19.7% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 31.3% (better) | 25.2% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 94.1% | 247% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 29.7% | 37.5% (better) |
| Operating margin | 13.7% (better) | 11.3% |
| Net margin | 10.8% (better) | 8.8% |
| FCF margin | 11.4% (better) | 4.6% |
| Return on equity | 42.6% (better) | 20.9% |
| Return on invested capital | 74.4% (better) | 28.2% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.15 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.84 | – |
| Current ratio | 1.61 (better) | 1.58 |
| Altman Z-score | 7.66 (better) | 4.73 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 9 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.76% | – |
| Payout ratio | 20.6% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 5 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 41.6% | – |
| Buyback yield | 1.6% | 3.9% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 2.4% | 3.9% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 94.0% | 73.4% |
| Held by insiders | 2.1% | 54.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$23.0M (better) | −$346M |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.3% | 18.2% |
Go deeper
- ROST stock overview
- ROST income statement
- ROST valuation and score
- URBN stock overview
- URBN income statement
- URBN valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.