Urban Outfitters vs Victoria's Secret
URBN and VSXY side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How URBN and VSXY compare
Urban Outfitters and Victoria's Secret are about the same size, with market caps of $7.8B and $7.7B.
On earnings, Urban Outfitters is cheaper: it trades at 14.2× trailing earnings, against 22.6× for Victoria's Secret.
Urban Outfitters grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (11.0% versus 10.3% for Victoria's Secret).
Urban Outfitters keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 8.8% compared with 5.5% at Victoria's Secret.
Urban Outfitters scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 12 for Victoria's Secret), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | URBN | VSXY |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $7.8B | $7.7B |
| Share price | $90.72 | $96.62 |
| Change, 1 year | 36.7% | 167% |
| Change, 5 years | 156% | 88.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.10 | 1.62 |
| Employees | 31K | 33K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 (better) | 12 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 | 3 |
| Performance score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 14.2× (better) | 22.6× |
| P/S | 1.2× | 1.1× (better) |
| P/B | 2.7× (better) | 7.8× |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.1× (better) | 10.8× |
| P/FCF | 26.3× | 13.9× (better) |
| PEG | 0.32 | – |
| FCF yield | 3.8% | 7.2% (better) |
| Fair value | $77.17 | $53.62 |
| Margin of safety | −17.6% (better) | −80.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 11.0% (better) | 10.3% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 12.3% (better) | 3.9% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 19.7% | 150% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 25.2% | 166% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 247% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 37.5% | 39.6% (better) |
| Operating margin | 11.3% (better) | 7.9% |
| Net margin | 8.8% (better) | 5.5% |
| FCF margin | 4.6% | 8.0% (better) |
| Return on equity | 20.9% | 45.3% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 28.2% | 28.7% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.98 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 0.60 |
| Interest coverage | – | 8.4× |
| Current ratio | 1.58 (better) | 1.36 |
| Altman Z-score | 4.73 (better) | 3.11 |
| Piotroski F-score | 9 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 3.9% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 3.9% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 73.4% | 107% |
| Held by insiders | 54.2% | 11.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$346M | −$212M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 18.2% | 14.4% |
Go deeper
- URBN stock overview
- URBN income statement
- URBN valuation and score
- VSXY stock overview
- VSXY income statement
- VSXY valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.