ResMed vs Dentsply Sirona
RMD and XRAY side by side, both in surgical, medical, and dental instruments and supplies. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How RMD and XRAY compare
ResMed is the larger company, worth 18 times as much as Dentsply Sirona ($33.7B against $1.8B).
ResMed grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (9.0% versus −1.4% for Dentsply Sirona).
ResMed keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 27.8% compared with −3.4% at Dentsply Sirona.
Both pay dividends: ResMed yields 0.78% and Dentsply Sirona 1.7%.
ResMed scores higher on the StockData Score (21 against 10 for Dentsply Sirona), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | RMD | XRAY |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $33.7B | $1.8B |
| Share price | $239.53 | $9.16 |
| Change, 1 year | −5.3% | −15.5% |
| Change, 5 years | −8.0% | −82.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.92 | 0.88 |
| Employees | 11K | 14K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 21 (better) | 10 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 3 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 21.8× | – |
| P/S | 5.9× | 0.5× (better) |
| P/B | 5.7× | 1.3× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 15.7× | 13.5× (better) |
| P/FCF | 20.9× | 17.7× (better) |
| PEG | 1.11 | – |
| FCF yield | 4.8% | 5.6% (better) |
| Fair value | $271.23 | $13.33 |
| Margin of safety | 11.7% | 31.3% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 9.0% (better) | −1.4% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 12.1% (better) | 2.0% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 10.8% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 12.4% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 26.3% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 61.1% (better) | 50.5% |
| Operating margin | 33.0% (better) | −1.5% |
| Net margin | 27.8% (better) | −3.4% |
| FCF margin | 28.1% (better) | 2.9% |
| Return on equity | 26.4% (better) | −8.5% |
| Return on invested capital | 29.7% (better) | −1.3% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.03 (better) | 1.62 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.41 | 7.06 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | −0.6× |
| Current ratio | 2.65 (better) | 1.63 |
| Altman Z-score | 12.00 (better) | 0.70 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.78% | 1.7% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 22.4% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 9.0% | 9.9% (better) |
| Buyback yield | 4.2% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 5.0% (better) | 1.7% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 71.1% | 114% |
| Held by insiders | 1.3% | 0.87% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$19.6M | $726K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 13.2% |
Go deeper
- RMD stock overview
- RMD income statement
- RMD valuation and score
- XRAY stock overview
- XRAY income statement
- XRAY valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.