DexCom vs ResMed
DXCM and RMD side by side, both in surgical, medical, and dental instruments and supplies. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DXCM and RMD compare
DexCom and ResMed are about the same size, with market caps of $31.1B and $33.2B.
On earnings, ResMed is cheaper: it trades at 22.0× trailing earnings, against 32.4× for DexCom.
DexCom grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (13.0% versus 9.9% for ResMed).
ResMed keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 26.9% compared with 19.4% at DexCom.
ResMed pays a dividend yielding 1.1%; DexCom does not pay one.
DexCom scores higher on the StockData Score (22 against 21 for ResMed), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DXCM | RMD |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $31.1B | $33.2B |
| Share price | $82.29 | $229.94 |
| Change, 1 year | 20.7% | −9.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −48.2% | −11.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.20 | 0.91 |
| Employees | 11K | 11K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 22 (better) | 21 |
| Valuation score | 4 | 4 |
| Growth score | 6 (better) | 3 |
| Performance score | 6 | 6 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 32.4× | 22.0× (better) |
| P/S | 6.1× | 5.9× (better) |
| P/B | 12.2× | 5.0× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 20.1× | 15.3× (better) |
| P/FCF | 28.3× | 20.1× (better) |
| PEG | 0.89 (better) | 1.12 |
| FCF yield | 3.5% | 5.0% (better) |
| Fair value | $117.75 | $259.82 |
| Margin of safety | 30.1% (better) | 11.5% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 13.0% (better) | 9.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 19.3% (better) | 12.1% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 37.5% (better) | 8.8% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 41.9% (better) | 9.7% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 9.5% | 26.3% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 63.4% (better) | 61.1% |
| Operating margin | 24.0% | 33.4% (better) |
| Net margin | 19.4% | 26.9% (better) |
| FCF margin | 21.5% | 29.2% (better) |
| Return on equity | 37.7% (better) | 24.3% |
| Return on invested capital | 78.0% (better) | 29.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.04 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | −0.58 |
| Interest coverage | 91.3× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.74 | 3.10 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 7.53 | 11.21 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.1% |
| Payout ratio | – | 23.0% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 5 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 9.0% |
| Buyback yield | −0.08% | 1.9% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | −0.08% | 3.0% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 102% | 69.4% |
| Held by insiders | 0.52% | 1.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$11.6M (better) | −$21.1M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.7% | – |
Go deeper
- DXCM stock overview
- DXCM income statement
- DXCM valuation and score
- RMD stock overview
- RMD income statement
- RMD valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.