Ryman Hospitality Properties vs RLJ Lodging Trust
RHP and RLJ side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How RHP and RLJ compare
Ryman Hospitality Properties is the larger company, worth 4.4 times as much as RLJ Lodging Trust ($8.4B against $1.9B).
Ryman Hospitality Properties grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (12.2% versus 1.1% for RLJ Lodging Trust).
Ryman Hospitality Properties keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 9.9% compared with 2.0% at RLJ Lodging Trust.
Both pay dividends: Ryman Hospitality Properties yields 3.6% and RLJ Lodging Trust 4.8%.
RLJ Lodging Trust scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 7 for Ryman Hospitality Properties), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | RHP | RLJ |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $8.4B | $1.9B |
| Share price | $133.18 | $12.61 |
| Change, 1 year | 53.7% | 83.3% |
| Change, 5 years | 39.9% | −18.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.89 | 0.99 |
| Employees | 1,819 | 75 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 8 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 33.1× | – |
| P/S | 3.1× | 1.4× (better) |
| P/B | 11.2× | 0.9× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.6× | 3.0× (better) |
| PEG | 1.90 | – |
| Fair value | $112.08 | $19.13 |
| Margin of safety | −18.8% | 34.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 12.2% (better) | 1.1% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 37.5% (better) | 23.3% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 3.6% (better) | −52.3% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −1.5% (better) | −100% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 43.8% | – |
| Operating margin | 19.8% | – |
| Net margin | 9.9% (better) | 2.0% |
| Return on equity | 35.1% (better) | 1.3% |
| Return on invested capital | 136% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | 2.1× | – |
| Altman Z-score | 1.75 (better) | 0.32 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.6% | 4.8% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 110% | 331% |
| Years of dividend growth | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 37.4% | 71.9% (better) |
| Buyback yield | – | 1.5% |
| Shareholder yield | 3.6% | 6.2% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 101% | 93.5% |
| Held by insiders | 3.1% | 4.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $1.6M (better) | −$101K |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.5% | 7.7% |
Go deeper
- RHP stock overview
- RHP income statement
- RHP valuation and score
- RLJ stock overview
- RLJ income statement
- RLJ valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.