Host Hotels & Resorts vs Ryman Hospitality Properties
HST and RHP side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How HST and RHP compare
Host Hotels & Resorts is the larger company, worth 2.1 times as much as Ryman Hospitality Properties ($17.3B against $8.4B).
On earnings, Host Hotels & Resorts is cheaper: it trades at 17.0× trailing earnings, against 33.1× for Ryman Hospitality Properties.
Ryman Hospitality Properties grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (12.2% versus 4.9% for Host Hotels & Resorts).
Host Hotels & Resorts keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 16.5% compared with 9.9% at Ryman Hospitality Properties.
Both pay dividends: Host Hotels & Resorts yields 6.6% and Ryman Hospitality Properties 3.6%.
Host Hotels & Resorts scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 7 for Ryman Hospitality Properties), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | HST | RHP |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $17.3B | $8.4B |
| Share price | $25.30 | $133.18 |
| Change, 1 year | 55.1% | 53.7% |
| Change, 5 years | 37.7% | 39.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.97 | 0.89 |
| Employees | 162 | 1,819 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 (better) | 7 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 17.0× (better) | 33.1× |
| P/S | 2.8× (better) | 3.1× |
| P/B | 2.7× (better) | 11.2× |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.1× (better) | 9.6× |
| PEG | 2.20 | 1.90 (better) |
| Fair value | $26.12 | $112.08 |
| Margin of safety | 3.1% (better) | −18.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 4.9% | 12.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 30.4% | 37.5% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 55.8% (better) | 3.6% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 58.5% (better) | −1.5% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 43.8% |
| Operating margin | 14.6% | 19.8% (better) |
| Net margin | 16.5% (better) | 9.9% |
| Return on equity | 15.8% | 35.1% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 16.3% | 136% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | 3.8× (better) | 2.1× |
| Altman Z-score | 2.19 (better) | 1.75 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 6.6% (better) | 3.6% |
| Payout ratio | 63.5% | 110% |
| Years of dividend growth | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 36.6% | 37.4% (better) |
| Buyback yield | 0.43% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 7.0% (better) | 3.6% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 103% | 101% |
| Held by insiders | 0.74% | 3.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$5.8M | $1.6M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.8% | 5.5% |
Go deeper
- HST stock overview
- HST income statement
- HST valuation and score
- RHP stock overview
- RHP income statement
- RHP valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.