QXO vs SiteOne Landscape Supply
QXO and SITE side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How QXO and SITE compare
QXO is the larger company, worth 2.4 times as much as SiteOne Landscape Supply ($11.5B against $4.8B).
QXO grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (408% versus 3.3% for SiteOne Landscape Supply).
SiteOne Landscape Supply keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 3.4% compared with −5.2% at QXO.
SiteOne Landscape Supply scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 6 for QXO), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | QXO | SITE |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $11.5B | $4.8B |
| Share price | $11.04 | $110.87 |
| Change, 1 year | −40.3% | −16.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −77.3% | −54.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.99 | 1.41 |
| Employees | 7,794 | 8,200 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 13 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 2 |
| Growth score | 3 | 3 |
| Performance score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 30.4× |
| P/S | 1.2× | 1.0× (better) |
| P/B | 1.1× (better) | 2.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 20.9× |
| P/FCF | 81.1× | 18.7× (better) |
| FCF yield | 1.2% | 5.4% (better) |
| Fair value | $12.94 | $97.93 |
| Margin of safety | 14.7% (better) | −13.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 408% (better) | 3.3% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 178% (better) | 11.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 30.9% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 33.2% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 4.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 24.0% | 35.1% (better) |
| Operating margin | −3.4% | 5.3% (better) |
| Net margin | −5.2% | 3.4% (better) |
| FCF margin | 1.4% | 5.4% (better) |
| Return on equity | −5.0% | 9.8% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −2.2% | 9.5% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.58 | 0.30 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 1.66 |
| Interest coverage | −1.4× | 7.1× (better) |
| Current ratio | 4.11 (better) | 2.30 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.42 | 4.06 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 2 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | −0.06% | 3.0% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | −0.06% | 3.0% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 85.8% | 108% |
| Held by insiders | 41.4% | 1.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | $879K |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 19.3% | 8.9% |
Go deeper
- QXO stock overview
- QXO income statement
- QXO valuation and score
- SITE stock overview
- SITE income statement
- SITE valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.