Core & Main vs QXO
CNM and QXO side by side, both in wholesale trade-durable goods. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CNM and QXO compare
QXO is the larger company, worth 1.4 times as much as Core & Main ($11.5B against $8.4B).
QXO grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (408% versus −0.54% for Core & Main).
Core & Main keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 6.0% compared with −5.2% at QXO.
Core & Main scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 6 for QXO), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CNM | QXO |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $8.4B | $11.5B |
| Share price | $44.25 | $11.04 |
| Change, 1 year | −16.7% | −40.3% |
| Change, 5 years | 63.2% | −77.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.22 | 0.99 |
| Employees | 5,600 | 7,794 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 (better) | 6 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 18.3× | – |
| P/S | 1.1× (better) | 1.2× |
| P/B | 4.2× | 1.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 11.5× | – |
| P/FCF | 13.4× (better) | 81.1× |
| PEG | 6.67 | – |
| FCF yield | 7.5% (better) | 1.2% |
| Fair value | $48.24 | $12.94 |
| Margin of safety | 8.3% | 14.7% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −0.54% | 408% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 16.0% | 178% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 6.5% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 8.5% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 27.0% (better) | 24.0% |
| Operating margin | 9.6% (better) | −3.4% |
| Net margin | 6.0% (better) | −5.2% |
| FCF margin | 8.2% (better) | 1.4% |
| Return on equity | 23.4% (better) | −5.0% |
| Return on invested capital | 13.7% (better) | −2.2% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.21 | 0.58 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.30 | – |
| Interest coverage | 6.3× (better) | −1.4× |
| Current ratio | 2.47 | 4.11 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 3.09 (better) | 1.42 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 2 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 4.3% (better) | −0.06% |
| Shareholder yield | 4.3% (better) | −0.06% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 105% | 85.8% |
| Held by insiders | 2.7% | 41.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$67.6K | – |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.7% | 19.3% |
Go deeper
- CNM stock overview
- CNM income statement
- CNM valuation and score
- QXO stock overview
- QXO income statement
- QXO valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.