StockData

Peraso vs Sequans Communications

PRSO and SQNS side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How PRSO and SQNS compare

Sequans Communications grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−28.5% versus −38.5% for Peraso).

Peraso keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −85.6% compared with −415% at Sequans Communications.

Peraso scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 3 for Sequans Communications), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricPRSOSQNS
Size and price
Market cap$5.8M–
Share price$0.383$2.44
Change, 1 year−63.2%−62.5%
Change, 5 years−99.8%−98.3%
Beta (5Y)1.260.81
Employees4237
StockData Score
Total score10 (better)3
Valuation score3 (better)0
Growth score1 (better)0
Performance score1 (better)0
Health score5 (better)3
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.7×–
P/B1.2×–
FCF yield−119%–
Fair value$1.10–
Margin of safety65.2%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−38.5%−28.5% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average6.0%–
Net income growth (TTM)–−290%
EPS growth (TTM)–−165%
Profitability
Gross margin56.6% (better)53.6%
Operating margin−85.8% (better)−425%
Net margin−85.6% (better)−415%
FCF margin−82.0%–
Return on equity−181%–
Return on invested capital−402%–
Financial health
Debt / equity0.00–
Interest coverage–−2.4×
Current ratio3.17 (better)0.34
Altman Z-score−38.20–
Piotroski F-score5 (better)2
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions3.6%0.38%
Held by insiders29.3%16.2%
Insider net buying, 12 months–$1.2M
Short interest, % of float13.4%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.