StockData

Peraso vs Sequans Communications

PRSO and SQNS side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How PRSO and SQNS compare

Sequans Communications grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−28.5% versus −58.3% for Peraso).

Peraso keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −159% compared with −415% at Sequans Communications.

Peraso scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 3 for Sequans Communications), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricPRSOSQNS
Size and price
Market cap$4.6M–
Share price$0.307$2.38
Change, 1 year−67.8%−63.6%
Change, 5 years−99.9%−98.3%
Beta (5Y)1.230.81
Employees4237
StockData Score
Total score8 (better)3
Valuation score3 (better)0
Growth score00
Performance score00
Health score5 (better)3
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.9×–
P/B1.8×–
FCF yield−170%–
Fair value$0.622–
Margin of safety50.7%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−58.3%−28.5% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average6.0%–
Net income growth (TTM)–−290%
EPS growth (TTM)–−165%
Profitability
Gross margin58.0% (better)53.6%
Operating margin−160% (better)−425%
Net margin−159% (better)−415%
FCF margin−145%–
Return on equity−278%–
Return on invested capital−366%–
Financial health
Debt / equity0.00–
Interest coverage–−2.4×
Current ratio2.03 (better)0.34
Altman Z-score−66.73–
Piotroski F-score5 (better)2
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions3.6%0.38%
Held by insiders29.3%16.2%
Insider net buying, 12 months–$1.2M
Short interest, % of float13.4%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.