PROG vs Upbound
PRG and UPBD side by side, both in miscellaneous equipment rental and leasing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How PRG and UPBD compare
PROG and Upbound are about the same size, with market caps of $1.4B and $1.2B.
On earnings, PROG is cheaper: it trades at 9.6× trailing earnings, against 13.4× for Upbound.
PROG grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (6.6% versus 5.9% for Upbound).
PROG keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 5.7% compared with 1.9% at Upbound.
Both pay dividends: PROG yields 1.6% and Upbound 7.5%.
PROG scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 15 for Upbound), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | PRG | UPBD |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.4B | $1.2B |
| Share price | $34.75 | $20.70 |
| Change, 1 year | 15.6% | −10.4% |
| Change, 5 years | −25.6% | −52.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.40 | 1.37 |
| Employees | – | 15K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 16 (better) | 15 |
| Valuation score | 6 | 6 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Health score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 4 | 4 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 9.6× (better) | 13.4× |
| P/S | 0.5× | 0.3× (better) |
| P/B | 1.7× | 1.6× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.0× | 4.6× (better) |
| P/FCF | 4.3× | 3.4× (better) |
| PEG | 0.41 | 0.17 (better) |
| FCF yield | 23.0% | 29.5% (better) |
| Fair value | $50.68 | $29.19 |
| Margin of safety | 31.4% (better) | 29.1% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 6.6% (better) | 5.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −0.61% | 10.8% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −31.7% | −11.5% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −28.6% | −13.5% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −19.6% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 49.1% |
| Operating margin | 8.5% (better) | 5.1% |
| Net margin | 5.7% (better) | 1.9% |
| FCF margin | 12.3% (better) | 7.5% |
| Return on equity | 19.9% (better) | 12.7% |
| Return on invested capital | 27.3% | 27.8% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | 3.8× (better) | 2.2× |
| Altman Z-score | 3.42 (better) | 2.56 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.6% | 7.5% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 14.7% | 100% |
| Years of dividend growth | 1 | 7 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 25.8% (better) | 5.7% |
| Buyback yield | 0.74% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 2.3% | 7.5% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 106% | 99.3% |
| Held by insiders | 3.9% | 3.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$183K | −$53.0K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 8.8% | 16.0% |
Go deeper
- PRG stock overview
- PRG income statement
- PRG valuation and score
- UPBD stock overview
- UPBD income statement
- UPBD valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.