PPG Industries vs RPM International
PPG and RPM side by side, both in chemicals and allied products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How PPG and RPM compare
PPG Industries is the larger company, worth 2.0 times as much as RPM International ($26.6B against $13.1B).
On earnings, PPG Industries is cheaper: it trades at 17.1× trailing earnings, against 19.0× for RPM International.
RPM International grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (6.0% versus 5.0% for PPG Industries).
PPG Industries keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 9.6% compared with 8.7% at RPM International.
Both pay dividends: PPG Industries yields 2.4% and RPM International 1.6%.
PPG Industries scores higher on the StockData Score (19 against 18 for RPM International), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | PPG | RPM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $26.6B | $13.1B |
| Share price | $119.52 | $102.44 |
| Change, 1 year | 20.6% | −5.5% |
| Change, 5 years | −26.7% | 14.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.03 | 0.91 |
| Employees | 44K | 18K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 19 (better) | 18 |
| Valuation score | 4 | 4 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 5 | 5 |
| Health score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 17.1× (better) | 19.0× |
| P/S | 1.6× (better) | 1.6× |
| P/B | 3.1× (better) | 3.8× |
| EV/EBITDA | 11.3× (better) | 12.3× |
| P/FCF | 18.9× | 18.5× (better) |
| PEG | 1.00 (better) | 1.64 |
| FCF yield | 5.3% | 5.4% (better) |
| Fair value | $138.94 | $115.92 |
| Margin of safety | 14.0% (better) | 11.6% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.0% | 6.0% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 2.8% | 5.2% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 55.5% (better) | 0.22% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 58.3% (better) | 0.93% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 9.3% (better) | 6.0% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 40.9% | 41.2% (better) |
| Net margin | 9.6% (better) | 8.7% |
| FCF margin | 8.6% | 8.9% (better) |
| Return on equity | 19.6% | 21.1% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.82 | 0.69 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.87 | 1.70 (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.58 | 1.76 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 3.49 (better) | 3.47 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.4% (better) | 1.6% |
| Payout ratio | 40.5% | 39.9% |
| Years of dividend growth | 16 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 5.8% | – |
| Buyback yield | 1.6% (better) | 0.63% |
| Shareholder yield | 4.0% (better) | 2.2% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 93.7% | 85.4% |
| Held by insiders | 0.10% | 1.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$15.2M | −$465K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.9% | 3.0% |
Go deeper
- PPG stock overview
- PPG income statement
- PPG valuation and score
- RPM stock overview
- RPM income statement
- RPM valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.