Axalta Coating Systems vs RPM International
AXTA and RPM side by side, both in chemicals and allied products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AXTA and RPM compare
RPM International is the larger company, worth 1.8 times as much as Axalta Coating Systems ($13.1B against $7.3B).
On earnings, RPM International is cheaper: it trades at 19.0× trailing earnings, against 22.0× for Axalta Coating Systems.
RPM International grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (6.0% versus 0.14% for Axalta Coating Systems).
RPM International keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 8.7% compared with 6.5% at Axalta Coating Systems.
RPM International pays a dividend yielding 1.6%; Axalta Coating Systems does not pay one.
RPM International scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 11 for Axalta Coating Systems), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AXTA | RPM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $7.3B | $13.1B |
| Share price | $34.07 | $102.44 |
| Change, 1 year | 15.6% | −5.5% |
| Change, 5 years | 5.4% | 14.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.11 | 0.91 |
| Employees | 12K | 18K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 | 18 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 22.0× | 19.0× (better) |
| P/S | 1.4× (better) | 1.6× |
| P/B | 2.8× (better) | 3.8× |
| EV/EBITDA | 10.2× (better) | 12.3× |
| P/FCF | 14.7× (better) | 18.5× |
| PEG | 0.83 (better) | 1.64 |
| FCF yield | 6.8% (better) | 5.4% |
| Fair value | $38.65 | $115.92 |
| Margin of safety | 11.9% (better) | 11.6% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 0.14% | 6.0% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.5% (better) | 5.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −26.6% | 0.22% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −25.8% | 0.93% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 27.3% (better) | 6.0% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 33.6% | 41.2% (better) |
| Operating margin | 12.4% | – |
| Net margin | 6.5% | 8.7% (better) |
| FCF margin | 9.6% (better) | 8.9% |
| Return on equity | 13.6% | 21.1% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 8.8% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.14 | 0.69 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.47 | 1.70 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 4.2× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.53 | 1.76 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.39 | 3.47 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.6% |
| Payout ratio | – | 39.9% |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.63% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 2.2% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 106% | 85.4% |
| Held by insiders | 0.49% | 1.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$465K |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.8% | 3.0% |
Go deeper
- AXTA stock overview
- AXTA income statement
- AXTA valuation and score
- RPM stock overview
- RPM income statement
- RPM valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.