Playtika vs Take Two Interactive Software
PLTK and TTWO side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How PLTK and TTWO compare
Take Two Interactive Software is the larger company, worth 44 times as much as Playtika ($43.3B against $976M).
Playtika grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (3.7% versus 3.1% for Take Two Interactive Software).
Take Two Interactive Software keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −3.8% compared with −9.8% at Playtika.
Playtika pays a dividend yielding 3.9%; Take Two Interactive Software does not pay one.
Playtika scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 5 for Take Two Interactive Software), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | PLTK | TTWO |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $976M | $43.3B |
| Share price | $2.56 | $231.31 |
| Change, 1 year | −38.9% | −1.2% |
| Change, 5 years | −87.0% | 35.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.12 | 0.80 |
| Employees | 3,175 | 13K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 (better) | 5 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.3× (better) | 6.7× |
| P/B | – | 11.8× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 2980× |
| P/FCF | 2.0× (better) | 441× |
| FCF yield | 49.3% (better) | 0.23% |
| Fair value | $13.09 | $108.73 |
| Margin of safety | 80.4% (better) | −113% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 3.7% (better) | 3.1% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 3.0% | 14.6% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −423% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −400% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 73.6% (better) | 56.6% |
| Operating margin | −2.8% | −2.8% (better) |
| Net margin | −9.8% | −3.8% (better) |
| FCF margin | 17.0% (better) | 1.5% |
| Return on equity | – | −6.8% |
| Return on invested capital | −4.1% | −3.2% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.69 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 57.18 |
| Interest coverage | −0.5× (better) | −1.3× |
| Current ratio | 1.14 (better) | 1.09 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.45 | 4.10 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.9% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Buyback yield | – | −0.14% |
| Shareholder yield | 3.9% (better) | −0.14% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 15.7% | 93.2% |
| Held by insiders | 65.4% | 2.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$554K (better) | −$165M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 2 |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.4% | 5.1% |
Go deeper
- PLTK stock overview
- PLTK income statement
- PLTK valuation and score
- TTWO stock overview
- TTWO income statement
- TTWO valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.