Prologis vs Welltower
PLD and WELL side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How PLD and WELL compare
Welltower is the larger company, worth 1.5 times as much as Prologis ($179B against $122B).
On earnings, Prologis is cheaper: it trades at 28.4× trailing earnings, against 106× for Welltower.
Welltower grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (39.2% versus 7.2% for Prologis).
Both pay dividends: Prologis yields 3.3% and Welltower 0.95%.
Prologis scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 10 for Welltower), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | PLD | WELL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $122B | $179B |
| Share price | $128.67 | $244.46 |
| Change, 1 year | 3.1% | 27.6% |
| Change, 5 years | −14.3% | 190% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.05 | 0.58 |
| Employees | 2,802 | 712 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 (better) | 10 |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 28.4× (better) | 106× |
| P/S | 13.1× | 13.0× (better) |
| P/B | 2.2× (better) | 3.7× |
| EV/EBITDA | 15.6× | – |
| PEG | – | 1.59 |
| Fair value | $113.15 | $90.61 |
| Margin of safety | −13.7% (better) | −170% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 7.2% | 39.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 14.6% | 18.7% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 32.9% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 32.1% | 59.3% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 12.1% (better) | −9.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 39.2% |
| Operating margin | 54.8% | – |
| Net margin | 45.5% | – |
| Return on equity | 7.9% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 9.2% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | 4.8× | – |
| Altman Z-score | 1.92 | 4.94 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.3% (better) | 0.95% |
| Payout ratio | 93.0% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 12 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 11.7% (better) | 0.87% |
| Shareholder yield | 3.3% (better) | 0.95% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 92.9% | 96.6% |
| Held by insiders | 0.24% | 0.04% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$8.1M | $2.4M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 2.4% |
Go deeper
- PLD stock overview
- PLD income statement
- PLD valuation and score
- WELL stock overview
- WELL income statement
- WELL valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.