Packaging Corp of America vs Suzano
PKG and SUZ side by side, both in paper and allied products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How PKG and SUZ compare
Packaging Corp of America grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (10.3% versus −6.8% for Suzano).
Suzano keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 17.1% compared with 7.3% at Packaging Corp of America.
Packaging Corp of America pays a dividend yielding 2.1%; Suzano does not pay one.
Packaging Corp of America scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 5 for Suzano), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | PKG | SUZ |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $22.9B | – |
| Share price | $256.82 | $9.24 |
| Change, 1 year | 30.6% | 0.87% |
| Change, 5 years | 89.7% | 3.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.65 | 0.53 |
| Employees | 17K | 23K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 (better) | 5 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 33.4× | – |
| P/S | 2.4× | – |
| P/B | 4.9× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 14.5× | – |
| P/FCF | 30.8× | – |
| FCF yield | 3.2% | – |
| Fair value | $154.51 | – |
| Margin of safety | −66.2% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 10.3% (better) | −6.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.2% | 10.5% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −23.5% | 4.4% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −23.2% | 5.2% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 12.1% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 20.1% | 28.7% (better) |
| Operating margin | 10.9% | 21.1% (better) |
| Net margin | 7.3% | 17.1% (better) |
| FCF margin | 7.8% | 26.9% (better) |
| Return on equity | 14.9% | 17.6% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 10.9% (better) | 8.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.85 (better) | 1.87 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.86 (better) | 3.52 |
| Interest coverage | – | 1.4× |
| Current ratio | 2.94 | 3.38 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 4.09 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.1% | – |
| Payout ratio | 64.8% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 8.2% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 2.1% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 98.1% | 5.8% |
| Held by insiders | 1.7% | 50.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$15.0M | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.4% | – |
Go deeper
- PKG stock overview
- PKG income statement
- PKG valuation and score
- SUZ stock overview
- SUZ income statement
- SUZ valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.