Piper Sandler Companies vs SEI Investments
PIPR and SEIC side by side, both in security brokers, dealers, and flotation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How PIPR and SEIC compare
SEI Investments is the larger company, worth 2.8 times as much as Piper Sandler Companies ($12.4B against $4.5B).
On earnings, Piper Sandler Companies is cheaper: it trades at 14.8× trailing earnings, against 18.2× for SEI Investments.
Piper Sandler Companies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (32.1% versus 11.1% for SEI Investments).
SEI Investments keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 28.8% compared with 14.5% at Piper Sandler Companies.
Both pay dividends: Piper Sandler Companies yields 3.1% and SEI Investments 1.0%.
SEI Investments scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 15 for Piper Sandler Companies), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | PIPR | SEIC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $4.5B | $12.4B |
| Share price | $63.81 | $103.42 |
| Change, 1 year | −21.8% | 28.3% |
| Change, 5 years | 42.5% | 60.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.31 | 0.96 |
| Employees | 1,858 | 5,029 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 | 17 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 14.8× (better) | 18.2× |
| P/S | 2.1× (better) | 5.1× |
| P/B | 3.3× (better) | 5.1× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 17.0× |
| P/FCF | – | 18.1× |
| PEG | 0.43 (better) | 1.04 |
| FCF yield | – | 5.5% |
| Fair value | $71.95 | $84.95 |
| Margin of safety | 11.3% (better) | −21.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 32.1% (better) | 11.1% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.7% (better) | 6.4% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 45.7% (better) | 2.6% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 46.0% (better) | 6.4% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 42.2% (better) | 13.4% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 36.0% |
| Operating margin | – | 28.9% |
| Net margin | 14.5% | 28.8% (better) |
| FCF margin | – | 28.0% |
| Return on equity | 23.6% | 30.1% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | 32.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.01 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | −0.56 |
| Interest coverage | – | 518× |
| Current ratio | – | 3.29 |
| Altman Z-score | 4.91 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.1% (better) | 1.0% |
| Payout ratio | 46.0% | 18.0% |
| Years of dividend growth | 1 | 12 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 23.3% (better) | 7.0% |
| Buyback yield | 2.8% | 3.4% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 5.9% (better) | 4.4% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 87.4% | 75.4% |
| Held by insiders | 2.0% | 3.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$12.9M (better) | −$50.1M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.0% | 2.7% |
Go deeper
- PIPR stock overview
- PIPR income statement
- PIPR valuation and score
- SEIC stock overview
- SEIC income statement
- SEIC valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.