Interactive Brokers vs SEI Investments
IBKR and SEIC side by side, both in security brokers, dealers, and flotation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How IBKR and SEIC compare
Interactive Brokers is the larger company, worth 2.8 times as much as SEI Investments ($34.8B against $12.4B).
On earnings, SEI Investments is cheaper: it trades at 18.2× trailing earnings, against 30.8× for Interactive Brokers.
Interactive Brokers grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (22.1% versus 11.1% for SEI Investments).
Both pay dividends: Interactive Brokers yields 0.44% and SEI Investments 1.0%.
SEI Investments scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 9 for Interactive Brokers), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | IBKR | SEIC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $34.8B | $12.4B |
| Share price | $76.90 | $103.42 |
| Change, 1 year | 11.1% | 28.3% |
| Change, 5 years | 317% | 60.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.13 | 0.96 |
| Employees | 3,182 | 5,029 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 17 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 0 | 6 (better) |
| Health score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 30.8× | 18.2× (better) |
| P/S | 12.8× | 5.1× (better) |
| P/B | 5.9× | 5.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 17.0× |
| P/FCF | – | 18.1× |
| PEG | 0.92 (better) | 1.04 |
| FCF yield | – | 5.5% |
| Fair value | $47.84 | $84.95 |
| Margin of safety | −60.7% | −21.7% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 22.1% (better) | 11.1% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 13.6% (better) | 6.4% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 2.6% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 31.6% (better) | 6.4% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 29.7% (better) | 13.4% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 36.0% |
| Operating margin | – | 28.9% |
| Net margin | – | 28.8% |
| FCF margin | – | 28.0% |
| Return on equity | – | 30.1% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 32.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | −0.56 |
| Interest coverage | – | 518× |
| Current ratio | – | 3.29 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.13 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.44% | 1.0% (better) |
| Payout ratio | – | 18.0% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 12 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 7.0% |
| Buyback yield | – | 3.4% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.44% | 4.4% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 85.7% | 75.4% |
| Held by insiders | 2.1% | 3.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$32.7M (better) | −$50.1M |
| Superinvestors holding | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.1% | 2.7% |
Go deeper
- IBKR stock overview
- IBKR income statement
- IBKR valuation and score
- SEIC stock overview
- SEIC income statement
- SEIC valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.