PulteGroup vs Toll Brothers
PHM and TOL side by side, both in operative builders. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How PHM and TOL compare
PulteGroup is the larger company, worth 1.7 times as much as Toll Brothers ($23.4B against $13.4B).
On earnings, Toll Brothers is cheaper: it trades at 11.7× trailing earnings, against 12.7× for PulteGroup.
Toll Brothers grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−1.1% versus −7.3% for PulteGroup).
PulteGroup keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 11.6% compared with 11.1% at Toll Brothers.
Both pay dividends: PulteGroup yields 0.83% and Toll Brothers 0.71%.
Toll Brothers scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 13 for PulteGroup), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | PHM | TOL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $23.4B | $13.4B |
| Share price | $124.74 | $145.95 |
| Change, 1 year | 5.5% | 8.4% |
| Change, 5 years | 147% | 135% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.01 | 1.12 |
| Employees | 6,506 | 4,900 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 1 |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividend score | 4 | 4 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 12.7× | 11.7× (better) |
| P/S | 1.4× | 1.3× (better) |
| P/B | 1.8× | 1.6× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 7.9× |
| P/FCF | 15.5× | 12.3× (better) |
| PEG | 38.39 | 1.59 (better) |
| FCF yield | 6.5% | 8.1% (better) |
| Fair value | $104.35 | $127.69 |
| Margin of safety | −19.5% | −14.3% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −7.3% | −1.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 9.4% (better) | 9.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −30.5% | −12.9% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −26.8% | −8.4% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 16.5% | 31.7% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 23.7% |
| Operating margin | – | 13.8% |
| Net margin | 11.6% (better) | 11.1% |
| FCF margin | 9.2% | 10.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | 14.9% (better) | 14.4% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 16.0% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Altman Z-score | 3.57 (better) | 3.26 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.83% (better) | 0.71% |
| Payout ratio | 9.9% | 8.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | 8 (better) | 5 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 13.0% | 17.4% (better) |
| Buyback yield | 5.5% (better) | 5.1% |
| Shareholder yield | 6.3% (better) | 5.8% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 95.3% | 94.0% |
| Held by insiders | 0.66% | 0.74% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$26.4M | −$26.1M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.4% | 4.3% |
Go deeper
- PHM stock overview
- PHM income statement
- PHM valuation and score
- TOL stock overview
- TOL income statement
- TOL valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.