NVR vs Toll Brothers
NVR and TOL side by side, both in operative builders. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How NVR and TOL compare
NVR is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as Toll Brothers ($15.9B against $13.4B).
On earnings, Toll Brothers is cheaper: it trades at 11.7× trailing earnings, against 15.4× for NVR.
Toll Brothers grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−1.1% versus −9.9% for NVR).
NVR keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 12.0% compared with 11.1% at Toll Brothers.
Toll Brothers pays a dividend yielding 0.71%; NVR does not pay one.
Toll Brothers scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 9 for NVR), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | NVR | TOL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $15.9B | $13.4B |
| Share price | $5958.56 | $145.95 |
| Change, 1 year | −18.7% | 8.4% |
| Change, 5 years | 17.1% | 135% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.74 | 1.12 |
| Employees | 6,300 | 4,900 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 4 | 4 |
| Health score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 15.4× | 11.7× (better) |
| P/S | 1.7× | 1.3× (better) |
| P/B | 4.7× | 1.6× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 7.9× |
| P/FCF | 15.2× | 12.3× (better) |
| PEG | – | 1.59 |
| FCF yield | 6.6% | 8.1% (better) |
| Fair value | $5610.93 | $127.69 |
| Margin of safety | −6.2% (better) | −14.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −9.9% | −1.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.5% | 9.2% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −24.9% | −12.9% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −18.6% | −8.4% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 13.7% | 31.7% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 23.7% |
| Operating margin | – | 13.8% |
| Net margin | 12.0% (better) | 11.1% |
| FCF margin | 11.0% (better) | 10.1% |
| Return on equity | 31.5% (better) | 14.4% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 16.0% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Altman Z-score | 10.63 (better) | 3.26 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.71% |
| Payout ratio | – | 8.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 5 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 17.4% |
| Buyback yield | 11.2% (better) | 5.1% |
| Shareholder yield | 11.2% (better) | 5.8% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 89.8% | 94.0% |
| Held by insiders | 5.2% | 0.74% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$8.4M (better) | −$26.1M |
| Superinvestors holding | 3 | 3 |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.7% | 4.3% |
Go deeper
- NVR stock overview
- NVR income statement
- NVR valuation and score
- TOL stock overview
- TOL income statement
- TOL valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.