PENN Entertainment vs Wynn Resorts
PENN and WYNN side by side, both in hotels and motels. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How PENN and WYNN compare
Wynn Resorts is the larger company, worth 3.6 times as much as PENN Entertainment ($7.7B against $2.1B).
Wynn Resorts grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (6.4% versus 6.1% for PENN Entertainment).
Wynn Resorts keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 6.1% compared with −12.7% at PENN Entertainment.
Wynn Resorts pays a dividend yielding 1.3%; PENN Entertainment does not pay one.
Wynn Resorts scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 5 for PENN Entertainment), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | PENN | WYNN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.1B | $7.7B |
| Share price | $15.89 | $74.66 |
| Change, 1 year | −4.3% | −38.2% |
| Change, 5 years | −74.3% | −23.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.48 | 1.02 |
| Employees | 23K | 29K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 17.9× |
| P/S | 0.3× (better) | 1.0× |
| P/B | 1.1× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 8.9× |
| P/FCF | – | 9.7× |
| FCF yield | – | 10.3% |
| Fair value | $35.52 | $90.69 |
| Margin of safety | 55.3% (better) | 17.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 6.1% | 6.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 14.2% | 27.8% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 16.9% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 16.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | −7.9% | 15.7% (better) |
| Net margin | −12.7% | 6.1% (better) |
| FCF margin | – | 10.7% |
| Return on equity | −37.4% | – |
| Return on invested capital | −10.1% | 11.5% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.49 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 5.07 |
| Interest coverage | −1.3× | 1.9× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.89 | 0.91 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.32 | 1.03 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.3% |
| Payout ratio | – | 40.4% |
| Buyback yield | 11.2% (better) | 2.2% |
| Shareholder yield | 11.2% (better) | 3.5% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 106% | 72.2% |
| Held by insiders | 7.1% | 13.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $888K | – |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 13.6% | 10.9% |
Go deeper
- PENN stock overview
- PENN income statement
- PENN valuation and score
- WYNN stock overview
- WYNN income statement
- WYNN valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.