MGM Resorts International vs Wynn Resorts
MGM and WYNN side by side, both in hotels and motels. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MGM and WYNN compare
MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts are about the same size, with market caps of $7.5B and $7.7B.
On earnings, Wynn Resorts is cheaper: it trades at 17.9× trailing earnings, against 18.5× for MGM Resorts International.
Wynn Resorts grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (6.4% versus 3.2% for MGM Resorts International).
Wynn Resorts keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 6.1% compared with 2.4% at MGM Resorts International.
Wynn Resorts pays a dividend yielding 1.3%; MGM Resorts International does not pay one.
Wynn Resorts scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 9 for MGM Resorts International), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MGM | WYNN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $7.5B | $7.7B |
| Share price | $29.96 | $74.66 |
| Change, 1 year | −4.0% | −38.2% |
| Change, 5 years | −40.5% | −23.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.30 | 1.02 |
| Employees | 62K | 29K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 | 2 |
| Health score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 18.5× | 17.9× (better) |
| P/S | 0.4× (better) | 1.0× |
| P/B | 3.0× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.7× (better) | 8.9× |
| P/FCF | 5.0× (better) | 9.7× |
| FCF yield | 19.8% (better) | 10.3% |
| Fair value | $40.70 | $90.69 |
| Margin of safety | 26.4% (better) | 17.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 3.2% | 6.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 27.7% | 27.8% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −21.1% | 16.9% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −11.0% | 16.2% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 5.7% | 15.7% (better) |
| Net margin | 2.4% | 6.1% (better) |
| FCF margin | 8.4% | 10.7% (better) |
| Return on equity | 15.5% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 15.4% (better) | 11.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 2.41 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.67 (better) | 5.07 |
| Interest coverage | 2.5× (better) | 1.9× |
| Current ratio | 1.33 (better) | 0.91 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.77 | 1.03 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.3% |
| Payout ratio | – | 40.4% |
| Buyback yield | 10.3% (better) | 2.2% |
| Shareholder yield | 10.3% (better) | 3.5% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 63.7% | 72.2% |
| Held by insiders | 83.8% | 13.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $75.6M | – |
| Superinvestors holding | 3 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 46.6% | 10.9% |
Go deeper
- MGM stock overview
- MGM income statement
- MGM valuation and score
- WYNN stock overview
- WYNN income statement
- WYNN valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.