Penguin Solutions vs Semtech
PENG and SMTC side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How PENG and SMTC compare
Semtech is the larger company, worth 3.7 times as much as Penguin Solutions ($10.7B against $2.9B).
On earnings, Penguin Solutions is cheaper: it trades at 18.2× trailing earnings, against 75.9× for Semtech.
Penguin Solutions grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (26.5% versus 17.8% for Semtech).
Semtech keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 13.1% compared with 10.4% at Penguin Solutions.
Penguin Solutions scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 8 for Semtech), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | PENG | SMTC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.9B | $10.7B |
| Share price | $47.36 | $114.59 |
| Change, 1 year | 128% | 59.8% |
| Change, 5 years | 63.1% | 24.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.12 | 1.84 |
| Employees | 2,800 | 1,920 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 | 3 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 18.2× (better) | 75.9× |
| P/S | 1.6× (better) | 9.1× |
| P/B | 5.5× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 14.0× (better) | 116× |
| P/FCF | – | 55.4× |
| FCF yield | −5.7% | 1.8% (better) |
| Fair value | $78.50 | $39.48 |
| Margin of safety | 39.7% (better) | −190% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 26.5% (better) | 17.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 10.4% | 12.0% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 611% (better) | 546% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 829% (better) | 421% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 42.7% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 27.7% | 52.1% (better) |
| Operating margin | 9.6% (better) | 8.0% |
| Net margin | 10.4% | 13.1% (better) |
| FCF margin | −9.4% | 16.4% (better) |
| Return on equity | 39.5% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 31.1% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.52 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.66 (better) | 3.06 |
| Interest coverage | – | 3.0× |
| Current ratio | 1.88 (better) | 1.70 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.22 | 8.06 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 2.2% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 2.2% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 95.1% | 100% |
| Held by insiders | 14.2% | 0.51% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$5.0M (better) | −$18.8M |
| Short interest, % of float | 12.4% | 8.1% |
Go deeper
- PENG stock overview
- PENG income statement
- PENG valuation and score
- SMTC stock overview
- SMTC income statement
- SMTC valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.