Pembina Pipeline vs SM Energy
PBA and SM side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How PBA and SM compare
SM Energy grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (108% versus 5.3% for Pembina Pipeline).
Pembina Pipeline keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 21.8% compared with 13.7% at SM Energy.
SM Energy pays a dividend yielding 2.6%; Pembina Pipeline does not pay one.
SM Energy scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 3 for Pembina Pipeline), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | PBA | SM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $7.8B |
| Share price | $50.31 | $32.73 |
| Change, 1 year | 32.1% | 78.7% |
| Change, 5 years | 52.9% | 8.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.39 | 0.99 |
| Employees | – | 1,241 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 7.9× |
| P/S | – | 1.1× |
| P/B | – | 1.0× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 4.5× |
| Fair value | – | $39.22 |
| Margin of safety | – | 16.6% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.3% | 108% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.5% | 22.9% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −9.1% | 29.0% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −11.3% (better) | −34.7% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 41.1% | 74.2% (better) |
| Operating margin | 36.1% (better) | 23.6% |
| Net margin | 21.8% (better) | 13.7% |
| Return on equity | – | 15.0% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 20.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.05 | – |
| Interest coverage | 4.7× (better) | 4.2× |
| Current ratio | 0.61 (better) | 0.57 |
| Altman Z-score | – | 1.27 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 2.6% |
| Payout ratio | – | 22.4% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 4 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 109% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 2.6% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 53.6% | 96.7% |
| Held by insiders | 0.00% | 0.90% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$1.6M |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 5.5% |
Go deeper
- PBA stock overview
- PBA income statement
- PBA valuation and score
- SM stock overview
- SM income statement
- SM valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.