UiPath vs Paylocity
PATH and PCTY side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How PATH and PCTY compare
Paylocity is the larger company, worth 1.3 times as much as UiPath ($9.1B against $7.2B).
On earnings, UiPath is cheaper: it trades at 20.5× trailing earnings, against 34.7× for Paylocity.
UiPath grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (15.0% versus 11.0% for Paylocity).
UiPath keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 21.0% compared with 15.2% at Paylocity.
Paylocity scores higher on the StockData Score (19 against 14 for UiPath), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | PATH | PCTY |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $7.2B | $9.1B |
| Share price | $13.73 | $170.91 |
| Change, 1 year | −15.3% | 20.8% |
| Change, 5 years | −75.5% | −39.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.58 | 1.14 |
| Employees | 3,981 | 6,900 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 | 19 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Performance score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 20.5× (better) | 34.7× |
| P/S | 4.2× (better) | 5.1× |
| P/B | 3.7× (better) | 7.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | 32.8× | 17.7× (better) |
| P/FCF | 19.7× | 18.2× (better) |
| PEG | – | 1.36 |
| FCF yield | 5.1% | 5.5% (better) |
| Fair value | $12.14 | $188.01 |
| Margin of safety | −13.1% | 9.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 15.0% (better) | 11.0% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 21.5% | 22.7% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 1695% (better) | 18.8% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 2133% (better) | 22.4% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 31.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 82.6% (better) | 69.2% |
| Operating margin | 8.9% | 21.8% (better) |
| Net margin | 21.0% (better) | 15.2% |
| FCF margin | 21.1% | 28.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | 20.0% | 22.0% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 34.7% (better) | 30.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | 2.39 (better) | 1.09 |
| Altman Z-score | 4.91 (better) | 2.52 |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 | 8 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 3.8% | 4.4% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 3.8% | 4.4% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 69.3% | 87.8% |
| Held by insiders | 28.5% | 21.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$54.0M | −$26.4M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 29.1% | 7.2% |
Go deeper
- PATH stock overview
- PATH income statement
- PATH valuation and score
- PCTY stock overview
- PCTY income statement
- PCTY valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.