Par Pacific vs Permian Resources
PARR and PR side by side, both in crude petroleum and natural gas. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How PARR and PR compare
Permian Resources is the larger company, worth 5.3 times as much as Par Pacific ($19.3B against $3.7B).
On earnings, Par Pacific is cheaper: it trades at 3.8× trailing earnings, against 12.0× for Permian Resources.
Par Pacific grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (29.1% versus 22.8% for Permian Resources).
Permian Resources keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 25.0% compared with 9.8% at Par Pacific.
Permian Resources pays a dividend yielding 2.7%; Par Pacific does not pay one.
Par Pacific scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 11 for Permian Resources), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | PARR | PR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.7B | $19.3B |
| Share price | $73.10 | $23.05 |
| Change, 1 year | 78.0% | 73.2% |
| Change, 5 years | 454% | 247% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.48 | 0.78 |
| Employees | 1,758 | 515 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 18 (better) | 11 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 3.8× (better) | 12.0× |
| P/S | 0.4× (better) | 3.0× |
| P/B | 1.6× | 1.6× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 2.4× (better) | 8.7× |
| P/FCF | 3.6× | – |
| PEG | 0.68 | – |
| FCF yield | 28.0% | – |
| Fair value | $128.72 | $21.82 |
| Margin of safety | 43.2% (better) | −5.6% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 29.1% (better) | 22.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 19.0% | 54.2% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 302% (better) | 96.4% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 305% (better) | 76.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 22.2% | – |
| Operating margin | 13.2% | 40.1% (better) |
| Net margin | 9.8% | 25.0% (better) |
| FCF margin | 10.6% | – |
| Return on equity | 50.9% (better) | 14.3% |
| Return on invested capital | 45.4% (better) | 14.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.21 (better) | 0.25 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.17 | 1.16 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 23.4× (better) | 10.3× |
| Current ratio | 1.65 (better) | 0.50 |
| Altman Z-score | 4.11 (better) | 2.58 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 2.7% |
| Payout ratio | – | 33.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Buyback yield | 2.0% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 2.0% | 2.7% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 99.2% | 91.3% |
| Held by insiders | 3.1% | 7.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$25.6M (better) | −$90.7M |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.4% | 3.8% |
Go deeper
- PARR stock overview
- PARR income statement
- PARR valuation and score
- PR stock overview
- PR income statement
- PR valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.