Oneok vs Williams Companies
OKE and WMB side by side, both in gas production and distribution. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How OKE and WMB compare
Williams Companies is the larger company, worth 1.5 times as much as Oneok ($90.9B against $61.2B).
On earnings, Oneok is cheaper: it trades at 16.7× trailing earnings, against 29.6× for Williams Companies.
Oneok grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (40.8% versus 8.7% for Williams Companies).
Williams Companies keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 25.2% compared with 9.3% at Oneok.
Both pay dividends: Oneok yields 4.4% and Williams Companies 2.8%.
Oneok scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 8 for Williams Companies), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | OKE | WMB |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $61.2B | $90.9B |
| Share price | $97.07 | $74.35 |
| Change, 1 year | 44.4% | 30.5% |
| Change, 5 years | 50.0% | 160% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.70 | 0.53 |
| Employees | 6,326 | 5,987 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 16.7× (better) | 29.6× |
| P/S | 1.6× (better) | 7.5× |
| P/B | 2.7× (better) | 6.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | 12.3× (better) | 17.7× |
| P/FCF | 21.1× | – |
| PEG | 1.37 (better) | 3.44 |
| FCF yield | 4.7% (better) | −0.12% |
| Fair value | $99.25 | $50.67 |
| Margin of safety | 2.2% (better) | −46.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 40.8% (better) | 8.7% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 31.5% (better) | 9.1% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 18.2% | 26.5% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 13.1% | 26.1% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 30.7% | 66.0% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 27.2% | – |
| Operating margin | 15.5% | 38.2% (better) |
| Net margin | 9.3% | 25.2% (better) |
| FCF margin | 7.4% (better) | −0.88% |
| Return on equity | 16.3% | 24.0% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 8.5% (better) | 8.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.44 (better) | 2.33 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 4.30 (better) | 4.37 |
| Interest coverage | 3.4× (better) | 3.1× |
| Current ratio | 0.74 (better) | 0.48 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.70 (better) | 1.32 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.4% (better) | 2.8% |
| Payout ratio | 72.3% | 81.5% |
| Years of dividend growth | 3 | 8 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 2.0% | 4.6% (better) |
| Buyback yield | – | −0.01% |
| Shareholder yield | 4.4% (better) | 2.8% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 83.7% | 89.8% |
| Held by insiders | 0.20% | 0.49% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $165K (better) | −$11.0M |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.9% | 2.2% |
Go deeper
- OKE stock overview
- OKE income statement
- OKE valuation and score
- WMB stock overview
- WMB income statement
- WMB valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.