Oil States International vs Weatherford International
OIS and WFRD side by side, both in construction, mining, and materials handling. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How OIS and WFRD compare
Weatherford International is the larger company, worth 11 times as much as Oil States International ($6.5B against $579M).
Oil States International grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−0.74% versus −7.2% for Weatherford International).
Weatherford International keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 7.7% compared with −16.5% at Oil States International.
Weatherford International pays a dividend yielding 1.2%; Oil States International does not pay one.
Weatherford International scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 5 for Oil States International), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | OIS | WFRD |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $579M | $6.5B |
| Share price | $9.60 | $90.63 |
| Change, 1 year | 40.8% | 23.8% |
| Change, 5 years | 40.8% | 180% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.93 | 0.98 |
| Employees | 2,172 | 17K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 13 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 17.9× |
| P/S | 0.9× (better) | 1.4× |
| P/B | 1.0× (better) | 3.6× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 7.7× |
| P/FCF | 17.1× | 12.4× (better) |
| PEG | – | 0.12 |
| FCF yield | 5.9% | 8.1% (better) |
| Fair value | $7.81 | $102.40 |
| Margin of safety | −22.9% | 11.5% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −0.74% (better) | −7.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 0.95% | 5.9% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −565% | −23.9% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −592% | −21.5% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 20.2% | – |
| Operating margin | −14.0% | 12.7% (better) |
| Net margin | −16.5% | 7.7% (better) |
| FCF margin | 5.2% | 11.0% (better) |
| Return on equity | −16.8% | 22.2% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −11.0% | 24.0% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.03 (better) | 0.83 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 0.43 |
| Current ratio | 2.36 (better) | 2.34 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.42 | 2.67 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.2% |
| Payout ratio | – | 20.8% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 1 |
| Buyback yield | 1.6% (better) | 0.62% |
| Shareholder yield | 1.6% | 1.8% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 92.0% | 106% |
| Held by insiders | 8.1% | 2.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$593K (better) | −$18.2M |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.0% | 5.9% |
Go deeper
- OIS stock overview
- OIS income statement
- OIS valuation and score
- WFRD stock overview
- WFRD income statement
- WFRD valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.