NOV vs Weatherford International
NOV and WFRD side by side, both in construction, mining, and materials handling. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How NOV and WFRD compare
NOV and Weatherford International are about the same size, with market caps of $6.9B and $6.5B.
On earnings, Weatherford International is cheaper: it trades at 17.9× trailing earnings, against 74.2× for NOV.
NOV grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−1.7% versus −7.2% for Weatherford International).
Weatherford International keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 7.7% compared with 1.1% at NOV.
Both pay dividends: NOV yields 2.3% and Weatherford International 1.2%.
Weatherford International scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 9 for NOV), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | NOV | WFRD |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $6.9B | $6.5B |
| Share price | $19.29 | $90.63 |
| Change, 1 year | 26.0% | 23.8% |
| Change, 5 years | 31.6% | 180% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.80 | 0.98 |
| Employees | 35K | 17K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 13 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 2 |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 74.2× | 17.9× (better) |
| P/S | 0.8× (better) | 1.4× |
| P/B | 1.1× (better) | 3.6× |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.3× | 7.7× (better) |
| P/FCF | 12.2× (better) | 12.4× |
| PEG | – | 0.12 |
| FCF yield | 8.2% (better) | 8.1% |
| Fair value | $20.51 | $102.40 |
| Margin of safety | 5.9% | 11.5% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −1.7% (better) | −7.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.5% (better) | 5.9% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −79.8% | −23.9% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −78.7% | −21.5% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 20.5% | – |
| Operating margin | 5.1% | 12.7% (better) |
| Net margin | 1.1% | 7.7% (better) |
| FCF margin | 6.5% | 11.0% (better) |
| Return on equity | 1.5% | 22.2% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 3.2% | 24.0% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.27 (better) | 0.83 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.67 | 0.43 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 5.0× | – |
| Current ratio | 2.42 (better) | 2.34 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.02 | 2.67 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.3% (better) | 1.2% |
| Payout ratio | 160% | 20.8% |
| Years of dividend growth | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 59.1% | – |
| Buyback yield | 4.3% (better) | 0.62% |
| Shareholder yield | 6.5% (better) | 1.8% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 109% | 106% |
| Held by insiders | 1.2% | 2.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$3.6M (better) | −$18.2M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.6% | 5.9% |
Go deeper
- NOV stock overview
- NOV income statement
- NOV valuation and score
- WFRD stock overview
- WFRD income statement
- WFRD valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.