Nutanix vs Veeva Systems
NTNX and VEEV side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How NTNX and VEEV compare
Veeva Systems is the larger company, worth 2580 times as much as Nutanix ($50.7B against $19.6M).
Veeva Systems grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (16.5% versus 12.4% for Nutanix).
Nutanix keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 52.8% compared with 29.3% at Veeva Systems.
Veeva Systems scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 14 for Nutanix), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | NTNX | VEEV |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $19.6M | $50.7B |
| Share price | $67.21 | $312.96 |
| Change, 1 year | −1.4% | 9.2% |
| Change, 5 years | 88.5% | −1.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.04 | 1.22 |
| Employees | 8,350 | 7,928 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 | 18 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 51.1× |
| P/S | 0.0× (better) | 14.7× |
| P/B | 0.0× (better) | 6.8× |
| EV/EBITDA | −6.8× | 42.0× (better) |
| P/FCF | 0.0× | – |
| PEG | – | 2.33 |
| FCF yield | 4281% | – |
| Fair value | $27956.70 | $249.87 |
| Margin of safety | 99.8% (better) | −25.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 12.4% | 16.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 15.4% | 16.9% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 700% (better) | 25.3% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 25.7% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 18.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 86.8% (better) | 75.0% |
| Operating margin | 9.6% | 29.9% (better) |
| Net margin | 52.8% (better) | 29.3% |
| FCF margin | 29.5% | – |
| Return on equity | 37460% (better) | 14.4% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 374% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | 1.80 | 5.46 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.04 | 21.04 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 2462% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 2462% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 98.2% | 89.8% |
| Held by insiders | 6.6% | 0.89% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$10.1M (better) | −$13.9M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.7% | 3.1% |
Go deeper
- NTNX stock overview
- NTNX income statement
- NTNX valuation and score
- VEEV stock overview
- VEEV income statement
- VEEV valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.