Nortech Systems vs Vicor
NSYS and VICR side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How NSYS and VICR compare
Vicor is the larger company, worth 254 times as much as Nortech Systems ($7.8B against $30.6M).
On earnings, Nortech Systems is cheaper: it trades at 17.0× trailing earnings, against 44.0× for Vicor.
Nortech Systems grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (57.8% versus 27.0% for Vicor).
Vicor keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 32.2% compared with 0.99% at Nortech Systems.
Vicor scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 11 for Nortech Systems), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | NSYS | VICR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $30.6M | $7.8B |
| Share price | $10.71 | $168.10 |
| Change, 1 year | 14.4% | 81.9% |
| Change, 5 years | 2.3% | 5.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.41 | 2.02 |
| Employees | 5 | 1,092 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 | 17 (better) |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 17.0× (better) | 44.0× |
| P/S | 0.2× (better) | 13.8× |
| P/B | 0.8× (better) | 8.6× |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.7× (better) | 45.0× |
| P/FCF | 6.4× (better) | 153× |
| PEG | – | 0.67 |
| FCF yield | 15.6% (better) | 0.66% |
| Fair value | $15.72 | $138.22 |
| Margin of safety | 31.9% (better) | −21.6% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 57.8% (better) | 27.0% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −34.9% | 8.8% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 119% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 110% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 44.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 11.6% | 60.6% (better) |
| Operating margin | 1.6% | 24.9% (better) |
| Net margin | 0.99% | 32.2% (better) |
| FCF margin | 2.6% | 9.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | 5.2% | 23.5% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 7.7% | 42.2% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.04 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.51 | – |
| Interest coverage | 3.3× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.74 | 11.44 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 3.39 | 64.70 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 7.8% | 47.6% |
| Held by insiders | 52.1% | 46.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$410M |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.24% | 8.6% |
Go deeper
- NSYS stock overview
- NSYS income statement
- NSYS valuation and score
- VICR stock overview
- VICR income statement
- VICR valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.