StockData

Neptune Insurance vs Zhibao Technology

NP and ZBAO side by side, both in insurance agents, brokers, and service. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How NP and ZBAO compare

Zhibao Technology grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (50.8% versus 33.8% for Neptune Insurance).

Neptune Insurance keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 22.7% compared with −22.4% at Zhibao Technology.

Neptune Insurance scores higher on the StockData Score (4 against 3 for Zhibao Technology), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricNPZBAO
Size and price
Market cap$3.9B–
Share price$28.48$0.219
Change, 1 year6.8%−99.5%
Change, 5 years−57.8%–
Beta (5Y)0.821.53
Employees6265
StockData Score
Total score4 (better)3
Valuation score00
Growth score13 (better)
Performance score2 (better)0
Health score1 (better)0
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E91.9×–
P/S20.0×–
EV/EBITDA48.2×–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)33.8%50.8% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)0.14% (better)−568%
EPS growth (TTM)–−541%
Profitability
Gross margin–41.0%
Operating margin41.3% (better)−19.3%
Net margin22.7% (better)−22.4%
Return on equity–−134%
Financial health
Debt / equity–1.79
Interest coverage5.4×–
Current ratio0.91 (better)0.86
Altman Z-score5.47–
Piotroski F-score6 (better)3
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions48.5%0.01%
Held by insiders81.3%72.3%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$438M–
Short interest, % of float8.3%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.