NOV vs Terex
NOV and TEX side by side, both in construction, mining, and materials handling. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How NOV and TEX compare
NOV and Terex are about the same size, with market caps of $6.4B and $6.5B.
On earnings, Terex is cheaper: it trades at 29.1× trailing earnings, against 45.0× for NOV.
Terex grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (40.1% versus −0.98% for NOV).
Terex keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 2.6% compared with 1.6% at NOV.
Both pay dividends: NOV yields 2.4% and Terex 0.89%.
NOV scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 9 for Terex), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | NOV | TEX |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $6.4B | $6.5B |
| Share price | $18.00 | $57.61 |
| Change, 1 year | 15.1% | 26.4% |
| Change, 5 years | 49.6% | 24.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.82 | 1.37 |
| Employees | 35K | 11K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 (better) | 9 |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 2 | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 45.0× | 29.1× (better) |
| P/S | 0.7× (better) | 0.9× |
| P/B | 1.0× (better) | 1.3× |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.5× (better) | 12.0× |
| P/FCF | 23.8× | – |
| FCF yield | 4.2% | – |
| Fair value | $16.24 | $41.43 |
| Margin of safety | −10.9% (better) | −39.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −0.98% | 40.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.5% | 12.0% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −62.7% | 26.9% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −60.0% | −15.7% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 20.7% (better) | 17.1% |
| Operating margin | 5.5% | 5.7% (better) |
| Net margin | 1.6% | 2.6% (better) |
| FCF margin | 3.1% | – |
| Return on equity | 2.3% | 5.7% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 3.4% | 6.4% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.27 (better) | 0.52 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.77 (better) | 3.02 |
| Interest coverage | 5.5× (better) | 2.2× |
| Current ratio | 2.51 (better) | 1.76 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.00 | 2.06 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.4% (better) | 0.89% |
| Payout ratio | 109% | 34.8% |
| Years of dividend growth | 2 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 59.1% | – |
| Buyback yield | 3.6% (better) | 1.2% |
| Shareholder yield | 6.0% (better) | 2.1% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 109% | 104% |
| Held by insiders | 1.2% | 1.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$4.6M | −$2.4M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.8% | 7.6% |
Go deeper
- NOV stock overview
- NOV income statement
- NOV valuation and score
- TEX stock overview
- TEX income statement
- TEX valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.