StockData

NIQ Global Intelligence vs Sportradar

NIQ and SRAD side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How NIQ and SRAD compare

Sportradar grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (16.6% versus 8.9% for NIQ Global Intelligence).

Sportradar keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 7.8% compared with −8.0% at NIQ Global Intelligence.

Sportradar scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 2 for NIQ Global Intelligence), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricNIQSRAD
Size and price
Market cap$5.8B–
Share price$19.83$12.03
Change, 1 year55.0%−54.0%
Change, 5 years37.9%−45.3%
Beta (5Y)0.841.44
Employees39K5,090
StockData Score
Total score212 (better)
Valuation score00
Growth score14 (better)
Performance score04 (better)
Health score14 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S1.3×–
P/B6.4×–
EV/EBITDA12.7×–
P/FCF11.6×–
FCF yield8.7%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)8.9%16.6% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average–26.1%
Net income growth (TTM)–194%
Profitability
Gross margin55.4%85.2% (better)
Operating margin1.9%–
Net margin−8.0%7.8% (better)
FCF margin11.5%30.9% (better)
Return on equity−65.3%10.5% (better)
Return on invested capital1.6%–
Financial health
Debt / equity3.910.06 (better)
Net debt / EBITDA4.33 (better)−1.11
Current ratio1.091.17 (better)
Altman Z-score0.86–
Piotroski F-score7 (better)6
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions84.4%16.6%
Held by insiders–9.9%
Insider net buying, 12 months$1.0M$11.3M (better)

Go deeper

Other comparisons

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.