NIQ Global Intelligence vs Pinterest
NIQ and PINS side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How NIQ and PINS compare
Pinterest is the larger company, worth 1.9 times as much as NIQ Global Intelligence ($11.0B against $5.8B).
Pinterest grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (15.4% versus 8.9% for NIQ Global Intelligence).
Pinterest keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 3.8% compared with −8.0% at NIQ Global Intelligence.
Pinterest scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 2 for NIQ Global Intelligence), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | NIQ | PINS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $5.8B | $11.0B |
| Share price | $19.83 | $19.36 |
| Change, 1 year | 55.0% | −41.0% |
| Change, 5 years | 37.9% | −58.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.84 | 1.38 |
| Employees | 39K | 5,265 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 2 | 11 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 77.4× |
| P/S | 1.3× (better) | 2.3× |
| P/B | 6.4× | 3.5× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 12.7× (better) | 41.2× |
| P/FCF | 11.6× | 8.7× (better) |
| FCF yield | 8.7% | 11.5% (better) |
| Fair value | – | $13.44 |
| Margin of safety | – | −44.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 8.9% | 15.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 20.1% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −91.0% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −91.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 55.4% | 79.0% (better) |
| Operating margin | 1.9% | 4.2% (better) |
| Net margin | −8.0% | 3.8% (better) |
| FCF margin | 11.5% | 27.0% (better) |
| Return on equity | −65.3% | 4.5% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 1.6% | 7.4% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 3.91 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 4.33 | – |
| Current ratio | 1.09 | 4.28 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.86 | 5.12 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | 23.0% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 23.0% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 84.4% | 91.0% |
| Held by insiders | – | 9.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $1.0M (better) | −$39.7M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 4 |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 8.8% |
Go deeper
- NIQ stock overview
- NIQ income statement
- NIQ valuation and score
- PINS stock overview
- PINS income statement
- PINS valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.