StockData

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial vs Nomura

MUFG and NMR side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How MUFG and NMR compare

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (9.5% versus 0.46% for Nomura).

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 14.6% compared with 7.6% at Nomura.

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 5 for Nomura), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricMUFGNMR
Size and price
Share price$21.56$9.38
Change, 1 year43.7%32.7%
Change, 5 years283%109%
Beta (5Y)0.860.96
Employees156K–
StockData Score
Total score6 (better)5
Valuation score00
Growth score3 (better)2
Performance score22
Health score11
Dividend score00
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)9.5% (better)0.46%
Revenue growth, 5Y average15.0%24.1% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)36.5% (better)6.3%
EPS growth (TTM)39.7% (better)7.2%
EPS growth, 5Y average11.8%19.6% (better)
Profitability
Operating margin19.9%–
Net margin14.6% (better)7.6%
FCF margin−30.9%−25.2% (better)
Return on equity9.1%10.1% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.47
Net debt / EBITDA–−0.80
Piotroski F-score5 (better)3
Dividends and buybacks
Payout ratio49.0%49.6%
Years of dividend growth8–
Dividend growth, 5Y average24.2%–
Ownership
Held by institutions2.9%3.0%
Held by insiders0.02%0.12%
Insider net buying, 12 months–$3.9K

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.