Match vs Sabre
MTCH and SABR side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MTCH and SABR compare
Match is the larger company, worth 15 times as much as Sabre ($9.5B against $654M).
On earnings, Sabre is cheaper: it trades at 1.0× trailing earnings, against 14.6× for Match.
Sabre grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (4.7% versus 1.7% for Match).
Match pays a dividend yielding 1.9%; Sabre does not pay one.
Match scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 6 for Sabre), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MTCH | SABR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $9.5B | $654M |
| Share price | $41.41 | $1.62 |
| Change, 1 year | 29.3% | −15.2% |
| Change, 5 years | −74.2% | −83.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.19 | 1.91 |
| Employees | 2,200 | 4,650 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 16 (better) | 6 |
| Valuation score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 14.6× | 1.0× (better) |
| P/S | 2.7× | 0.2× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.0× (better) | 10.0× |
| P/FCF | 8.3× | – |
| PEG | 0.60 | – |
| FCF yield | 12.0% (better) | −2.5% |
| Fair value | $60.11 | $27.13 |
| Margin of safety | 31.1% | 94.0% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 1.7% | 4.7% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.8% | 15.7% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 40.1% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 29.2% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 74.8% (better) | 56.2% |
| Operating margin | 28.2% (better) | 11.3% |
| FCF margin | 32.5% (better) | −0.57% |
| Return on invested capital | 79.5% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.59 | 8.43 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 6.0× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.72 (better) | 1.02 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.18 (better) | −0.25 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.9% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 1 | – |
| Buyback yield | 6.5% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 8.4% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 106% | 98.7% |
| Held by insiders | 5.6% | 15.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$2.4M | $24.7M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.3% | 8.1% |
Go deeper
- MTCH stock overview
- MTCH income statement
- MTCH valuation and score
- SABR stock overview
- SABR income statement
- SABR valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.