Monster Beverage vs Boston Beer
MNST and SAM side by side, both in beverages. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MNST and SAM compare
Monster Beverage is the larger company, worth 20 times as much as Boston Beer ($44.5B against $2.2B).
Monster Beverage grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (20.2% versus −3.7% for Boston Beer).
Monster Beverage scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 9 for Boston Beer), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MNST | SAM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $44.5B | $2.2B |
| Share price | $45.40 | $219.16 |
| Change, 1 year | 29.7% | 8.9% |
| Change, 5 years | 103% | −52.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.48 | 0.74 |
| Employees | 6,891 | 2,543 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 (better) | 9 |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 40.9× | – |
| P/S | 4.6× | 1.2× (better) |
| P/B | 4.5× | 3.0× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 14.3× | – |
| P/FCF | 23.1× | 12.0× (better) |
| FCF yield | 4.3% | 8.3% (better) |
| Fair value | $48.46 | $260.56 |
| Margin of safety | 6.3% | 15.9% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 20.2% (better) | −3.7% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 12.5% (better) | 2.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −179% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 24.7% (better) | −181% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −8.6% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 55.3% (better) | 49.1% |
| Operating margin | 28.5% (better) | −5.1% |
| Net margin | – | −3.8% |
| FCF margin | 20.0% (better) | 9.7% |
| Return on equity | – | −8.9% |
| Return on invested capital | 37.0% (better) | −14.0% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | 3.82 (better) | 1.13 |
| Altman Z-score | 16.18 (better) | 4.02 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 8 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 0.34% | 5.6% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 0.34% | 5.6% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 136% | 85.1% |
| Held by insiders | 42.7% | 25.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$33.5M | $0 (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 8.3% | 21.4% |
Go deeper
- MNST stock overview
- MNST income statement
- MNST valuation and score
- SAM stock overview
- SAM income statement
- SAM valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.