Monster Beverage vs Molson Coors Beverage
MNST and TAP side by side, both in beverages. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MNST and TAP compare
Monster Beverage is the larger company, worth 6.5 times as much as Molson Coors Beverage ($46.4B against $7.1B).
Monster Beverage grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (20.4% versus −2.6% for Molson Coors Beverage).
Molson Coors Beverage pays a dividend yielding 4.8%; Monster Beverage does not pay one.
Monster Beverage scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 9 for Molson Coors Beverage), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MNST | TAP |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $46.4B | $7.1B |
| Share price | $47.34 | $40.12 |
| Change, 1 year | 42.2% | −7.8% |
| Change, 5 years | 107% | −13.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.48 | 0.37 |
| Employees | 6,891 | 16K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 (better) | 9 |
| Valuation score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 21.9× | – |
| P/S | 5.0× | 0.5× (better) |
| P/B | 5.0× | 0.7× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 15.3× | – |
| P/FCF | 22.1× | 5.3× (better) |
| FCF yield | 4.5% | 18.7% (better) |
| Fair value | $45.02 | $101.37 |
| Margin of safety | −5.2% | 60.4% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 20.4% (better) | −2.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 12.5% (better) | 2.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −322% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 34.2% (better) | −328% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 55.5% (better) | 31.7% |
| Operating margin | 29.2% (better) | −19.5% |
| Net margin | – | −17.8% |
| FCF margin | 22.8% (better) | 10.3% |
| Return on equity | – | −19.6% |
| Return on invested capital | 37.2% (better) | −11.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.76 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | −9.9× |
| Current ratio | 3.73 (better) | 0.88 |
| Altman Z-score | 17.16 (better) | 0.80 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 4.8% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 5 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 27.0% |
| Buyback yield | 0.14% | 7.8% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 0.14% | 12.5% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 136% | 106% |
| Held by insiders | 42.7% | 14.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$36.2M | $498K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 2 |
| Short interest, % of float | 8.1% | – |
Go deeper
- MNST stock overview
- MNST income statement
- MNST valuation and score
- TAP stock overview
- TAP income statement
- TAP valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.