M/I Homes vs NVR
MHO and NVR side by side, both in operative builders. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MHO and NVR compare
NVR is the larger company, worth 4.9 times as much as M/I Homes ($15.9B against $3.2B).
On earnings, M/I Homes is cheaper: it trades at 10.8× trailing earnings, against 15.4× for NVR.
M/I Homes grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−5.0% versus −9.9% for NVR).
NVR keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 12.0% compared with 7.4% at M/I Homes.
M/I Homes scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 9 for NVR), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MHO | NVR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.2B | $15.9B |
| Share price | $128.28 | $5958.56 |
| Change, 1 year | 2.6% | −18.7% |
| Change, 5 years | 115% | 17.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.18 | 0.74 |
| Employees | 1,801 | 6,300 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 (better) | 9 |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 10.8× (better) | 15.4× |
| P/S | 0.8× (better) | 1.7× |
| P/B | 1.0× (better) | 4.7× |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.3× | – |
| P/FCF | 16.5× | 15.2× (better) |
| FCF yield | 6.0% | 6.6% (better) |
| Fair value | $120.59 | $5610.93 |
| Margin of safety | −6.4% | −6.2% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −5.0% (better) | −9.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.7% (better) | 6.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −37.9% | −24.9% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −34.8% | −18.6% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 12.4% | 13.7% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 21.5% | – |
| Operating margin | 9.3% | – |
| Net margin | 7.4% | 12.0% (better) |
| FCF margin | 4.6% | 11.0% (better) |
| Return on equity | 10.1% | 31.5% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 13.1% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Altman Z-score | 3.33 | 10.63 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 6.2% | 11.2% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 6.2% | 11.2% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 97.8% | 89.8% |
| Held by insiders | 3.5% | 5.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$22.8M | −$8.4M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 3 |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.1% | 5.7% |
Go deeper
- MHO stock overview
- MHO income statement
- MHO valuation and score
- NVR stock overview
- NVR income statement
- NVR valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.