MGM Resorts International vs PENN Entertainment
MGM and PENN side by side, both in hotels and motels. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MGM and PENN compare
MGM Resorts International is the larger company, worth 3.5 times as much as PENN Entertainment ($7.5B against $2.1B).
PENN Entertainment grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (6.1% versus 3.2% for MGM Resorts International).
MGM Resorts International keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 2.4% compared with −12.7% at PENN Entertainment.
MGM Resorts International scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 5 for PENN Entertainment), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MGM | PENN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $7.5B | $2.1B |
| Share price | $29.96 | $15.89 |
| Change, 1 year | −4.0% | −4.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −40.5% | −74.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.30 | 1.48 |
| Employees | 62K | 23K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 (better) | 5 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 18.5× | – |
| P/S | 0.4× | 0.3× (better) |
| P/B | 3.0× | 1.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.7× | – |
| P/FCF | 5.0× | – |
| FCF yield | 19.8% | – |
| Fair value | $40.70 | $35.52 |
| Margin of safety | 26.4% | 55.3% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 3.2% | 6.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 27.7% (better) | 14.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −21.1% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −11.0% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 5.7% (better) | −7.9% |
| Net margin | 2.4% (better) | −12.7% |
| FCF margin | 8.4% | – |
| Return on equity | 15.5% (better) | −37.4% |
| Return on invested capital | 15.4% (better) | −10.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 2.41 | 1.49 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.67 | – |
| Interest coverage | 2.5× (better) | −1.3× |
| Current ratio | 1.33 (better) | 0.89 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.77 (better) | 0.32 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 10.3% | 11.2% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 10.3% | 11.2% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 63.7% | 106% |
| Held by insiders | 83.8% | 7.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $75.6M (better) | $888K |
| Superinvestors holding | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 46.6% | 13.6% |
Go deeper
- MGM stock overview
- MGM income statement
- MGM valuation and score
- PENN stock overview
- PENN income statement
- PENN valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.