Mizuho Financial vs Nomura
MFG and NMR side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MFG and NMR compare
Mizuho Financial grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (7.6% versus 0.46% for Nomura).
Mizuho Financial keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 13.2% compared with 7.6% at Nomura.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MFG | NMR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $9.66 | $9.38 |
| Change, 1 year | 46.1% | 32.7% |
| Change, 5 years | 258% | 109% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.76 | 0.96 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 5 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 2 | 2 |
| Health score | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 7.6% (better) | 0.46% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 20.2% | 24.1% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 95.2% (better) | 6.3% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 98.7% (better) | 7.2% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 15.2% | 19.6% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 13.2% (better) | 7.6% |
| FCF margin | −23.7% (better) | −25.2% |
| Return on equity | 11.1% (better) | 10.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.47 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | −0.80 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Payout ratio | 31.8% | 49.6% |
| Years of dividend growth | 5 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 14.1% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 10.9% | 3.0% |
| Held by insiders | 0.01% | 0.12% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | $3.9K |
Go deeper
- MFG stock overview
- MFG income statement
- MFG valuation and score
- NMR stock overview
- NMR income statement
- NMR valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.