Mativ vs Suzano
MATV and SUZ side by side, both in paper and allied products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MATV and SUZ compare
Mativ grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (1.1% versus −6.8% for Suzano).
Suzano keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 17.1% compared with 4.5% at Mativ.
Mativ pays a dividend yielding 3.5%; Suzano does not pay one.
Mativ scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 5 for Suzano), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MATV | SUZ |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $626M | – |
| Share price | $11.34 | $9.24 |
| Change, 1 year | 4.1% | 0.87% |
| Change, 5 years | −66.9% | 3.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.20 | 0.53 |
| Employees | 5,000 | 23K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 (better) | 5 |
| Valuation score | 6 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 3 | 3 |
| Health score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 7.0× | – |
| P/S | 0.3× | – |
| P/B | 1.3× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.4× | – |
| P/FCF | 4.9× | – |
| FCF yield | 20.4% | – |
| Fair value | $20.84 | – |
| Margin of safety | 45.6% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 1.1% (better) | −6.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 13.1% (better) | 10.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 4.4% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 5.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 19.4% | 28.7% (better) |
| Operating margin | 3.5% | 21.1% (better) |
| Net margin | 4.5% | 17.1% (better) |
| FCF margin | 6.4% | 26.9% (better) |
| Return on equity | 20.2% (better) | 17.6% |
| Return on invested capital | 3.9% | 8.1% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 2.07 | 1.87 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 4.37 | 3.52 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 1.0× | 1.4× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.98 | 3.38 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.40 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.5% | – |
| Payout ratio | 25.0% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | −25.6% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 3.5% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 93.9% | 5.8% |
| Held by insiders | 2.3% | 50.1% |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.0% | – |
Go deeper
- MATV stock overview
- MATV income statement
- MATV valuation and score
- SUZ stock overview
- SUZ income statement
- SUZ valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.